Mortgage Services Agree To Reforms

Washington Post

By Dina ElBoghdady

Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011

Three federal agencies announced agreements with the nation’s largest mortgage servicers Wednesday that aim to stem shoddy foreclosure practices. But the plans do not immediately impose financial penalties on the companies or force them to reduce the mortgage debt for troubled borrowers.

The deals require the mortgage servicers to identify and compensate borrowers who suffered financial harm, but the details have not yet been decided. The companies must also provide a single point of contact for struggling borrowers, many of whom complain of getting the runaround when they try to get help. Servicers also would not be able to foreclose on borrowers after granting them a loan modification.

Some lawmakers and consumer groups said the enforcement actions are weak and won’t fix the problems that surfaced last fall. By then, news reports and lawsuits showed that mortgage servicers were using fake documents, forged signatures and other shortcuts to quickly evict families from foreclosed houses. The revelations prompted many of the nation’s largest lenders to temporarily halt foreclosures and sort through the mess.

The three regulators that reached the deal Wednesday — the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve and the soon-defunct Office of Thrift Supervision — have at times been cast by those critics as being too friendly to the industry.

State attorneys general, the Justice Department and several federal agencies are trying to negotiate a separate settlement with the banks, which sources say might force the companies to pay at least $20 billion in fines. That money would then be used to slash the mortgage debt of borrowers who owe more than their houses are worth.

The OCC said its deal would not undermine the broader settlement being negotiated by the attorneys general.

“I would not only hope that they would dovetail, but I think the two really need to mesh,” said John Walsh, acting comptroller of the currency.

Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli, a lead negotiator for the Justice Department, said federal and state officials met with the largest mortgage servicers Wednesday to hammer out a deal that goes further than the agreements fashioned by the OCC and its partner agencies. For instance, Perrelli said his team is looking into how foreclosures are handled in bankruptcy court.

“We identified many of the same deficiencies but others as well,” Perrelli said.

Sources familiar with the matter said a rift has formed among the state officials and regulators who favor a get-tough approach and the officials from the OCC and its partners who have warned against overreaching.

Officials said the deal fashioned by the OCC, Fed and OTS will eventually impose civil penalties on the servicers. In addition, the servicers must hire an independent consultant to review foreclosures over the past two years to determine whether laws were broken and borrowers were wrongfully harmed. Based on the findings, the agencies would determine what restitution the bank would have to provide to those borrowers.

The mortgage servicers also have to come up with a plan to improve their handling of foreclosures and loan modifications in about two months.

The banks that have signed onto these agreements are Ally Financial, SunTrust, HSBC, Bank of America, Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, MetLife, PNC, U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo. The banks represent 65 percent of the mortgage servicing industry, or nearly $6.8 trillion in mortgage balances.

The three agencies also addressed failures and unsound practices at MERSCORP, which registers and tracks mortgage ownership on behalf of the industry, and Lender Processing Service, which provides default-management services.

The actions taken by the three agencies are based on the findings of an interagency review last year that discovered “significant problems” from a sampling of foreclosure actions by those companies.

The companies violated federal and state laws, mishandled foreclosure documents and failed to properly oversee the foreclosure attorneys working on their behalf, the review concluded, contradicting past claims by the industry.

Consumer advocates and some lawmakers reacted negatively.

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said the enforcement actions are “disappointing – but not surprising – given the history of our nation’s banking regulators” who have been accused of being too soft on the institutions they oversee.

“I fear that these consent orders are merely an attempt to do an end-run around our state attorneys general,” Waters said in a statement.

Consumers Face Huge Losses With Debt Settlement Firms

Posted 9:30 AM 08/31/10 ,

 

By CHARLES WALLACE Posted 9:30 AM 08/31/10 Economy, Credit

Consumers are being warned to exercise extreme caution in dealing with companies that offer to reduce credit card debts. The warning follows a little-noticed rule announced by the Federal Trade Commission which is likely to put many put of these firms out of business in the next few months, but only after they have collected millions of dollars in fees without providing any service.

“There’s 9 million customers in these plans who are going to be hung out to dry basically,” says consumer advocate Jordan E. Goodman, author of Master Your Debt: Slash Your Monthly Payments and Become Debt Free. “These firms have collected millions of dollars from people and they are going to lose the money; it’s just going to be a complete disaster.”

Heavy on Ads, Light on Results

Everyone has seen the ads that predominate on the Internet and on late night cable television: We can help you settle your credit card debt for 50 cents on the dollar and you can be debt free in 12 months. Some even invoke President Obama’s name and say the administration included the reduction of credit card debt in the 2009 stimulus. But there wasn’t any credit card bailout.

By the industry’s own accounting, which it made public during hearings on the FTC rule, as few as 30% of consumers ever achieve a settlement of any kind. But they still have to pay thousands of dollars in upfront fees to the debt settlement companies.

In an effort to halt this abuse, the FTC adopted a rule on July 28 that prohibits firms from collecting upfront fees from consumers in debt settlement cases. Instead, they will have to wait until at least a partial settlement is made before collecting their fee. They will also be forced to disclose how long the process will take and the possible negative consequences of using a debt relief service.

But the new rule does not take effect until Oct. 27, and the debt settlement companies are still feverishly advertising their services and may legally continue to collect these fees until the cutoff date.

Goodman says that there is real concern that many firms will simply go bankrupt or close down because their business models depend on getting upfront fees, not waiting three or four years for a settlement.

“These firms can’t make it if they are only going to live on success fees and they are going to fold like crazy,” Goodman says.

Jenna Keehnen, executive director of the United States Organizations for Bankruptcy Alternatives, a debt settlement trade association, says that 12 of the association’s members have already gone out of business in August, two months before the deadline, and “I do expect to lose quite a few more.”

Disappearing in a Cloud of Fees

What happens to the consumer when the company goes under? Under the typical contract with debt settlement companies, consumers stop paying their lenders and instead pay into an escrow account for both the fees and the balance on their credit card debt. The escrow accounts are usually at third party institutions, but there is nothing in the current law to prevent a company from closing on Oct. 27 and taking its fees without performing any service.

Andrew Pizor, an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center in Washington, D.C., says that past practice has shown that if there is no settlement, most consumers end up losing their money.

“Most of these firms are not providing much of a valid service and I think they are susceptible to going belly up in the first place,” Pizor says “The new rules are forcing companies to either change their models or stop operations so that could cause an increase in that.”

Legally, the debt collection firms cannot touch the consumer’s money in the escrow accounts except for their fees, but what will happen to those accounts when the firms disappear remains unclear. Goodman says that in the case of Ameridebt, a debt modification firm, tens of thousands of consumers lost their money after the FTC closed the firm down in 2005.

Pizor says the new rule is a major improvement because it prevents a company from taking any fee until they at least partially settle a consumer’s debts, which wasn’t legally required in the past.

“On the flip side, it’s far from perfect because the size of the fee is not tied to the amount saved,” Pizor says. “Someone can get the creditor to knock five bucks off the original debt and the debt settlement company can charge you a fortune in fees. Without a definition of settlement or tying the size of the fee to the amount saved there is still room for a lot of abuse.”

See full article from DailyFinance: http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/credit/debt-settlement-firms-going-out-business/19613606/?icid=sphere_copyright

US bankruptcies resume upward path in 1st quarter

* Consumer filings up 18 pct, business filings up 2 pct

* Nevada has most filings per capita, Arizona filings soar

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK, May 14 (Reuters) - U.S. bankruptcy filings resumed their upward climb in the first quarter, nearly equaling their highest level since 2005, as high unemployment and a still-strained housing market squeezed consumers.

There were 388,148 filings between January and September, up 17 percent from 330,394 a year earlier, according to data released Friday by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. Consumer filings rose 18 percent to 373,541, while business filings edged up 2 percent to 14,607.

Filings also rose 4 percent from last year’s fourth quarter, the government data show. That had been the first period with a quarter-to-quarter drop in filings since 2006.

Read full article here.

Did Changing Bankruptcy Laws Cause the Mortgage Mess?

By Mark Lieberman, Senior Economist

Source: FOXBusiness

During the debate over changes in personal bankruptcy laws, bankers were tripping over themselves to get Congress to agree to changes to make filing personal bankruptcy more difficult. The changes, they argued, would make borrowers more responsible – and by the way reduce bank losses as debts could no longer as easily be discharged in bankruptcy.

Now, in a classic case of be-careful-what-you-wish, a team of three economists argue “the U.S. bankruptcy reform of 2005 played an important role in the mortgage crisis and the current recession” – by increasing mortgage delinquencies and defaults by almost 200,000 a year.

“The 2005 bankruptcy reform caused mortgage default rates to rise,” the economists — Wenli Li of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Michelle J. White of the University of California at San Diego and Ning Zhu of the Graduate School of Management at the University of California, Davis– concluded. “Bankruptcy reform squeezed homeowners’ budgets by raising the cost of filing for bankruptcy and reducing the amount of debt discharged in bankruptcy. It therefore increased mortgage default by closing off a popular procedure that previously helped financially distressed homeowners save their homes.”

CLICK HERE TO READ FULL ARTICLE.

Queens homeowners sue Chase to gain relief from foreclosure

By Anna Gustafson

Three Queens homeowners filed a lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase Bank Tuesday for allegedly illegally delaying and denying their applications for foreclosure relief.

The Jamaica, Queens Village and Fresh Meadows residents and attorneys from the Urban Justice Center filed the suit in federal court in Brooklyn that alleges the bank refused to provide them the help guaranteed to them under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program.

CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE